remote logins are currently disabled что значит
Remote logins are currently disabled что значит
This forum has migrated to Microsoft Q&A. Visit Microsoft Q&A to post new questions.
Answered by:
Question
I have a RDS farm with two RD Session Hosts. I use DNS Round Robin and life is good and everything working until I try to take out one of the servers from the farm. To do so I go to the RD Session Host Configuration | Member of farm in RD Connection Broker | General tab | and check ‘Allow connections, but prevent new logons’.
When users now try to connect to the farm and DNS resolves the farm entry rdsfarm1.domain.com with the IP pointing to the RD Session Host I disabled they see the message ‘Remote Logins are currently disabled’. If they hit the server which is not disabled then everything works fine.
I now found the following thread in this forum and in there is sounds like this is expected. I personally would have expected that disabled RDS Session Host is still forwarding requests to Connection Broker but that does not seem to be the case.
If this is expected and I would have to take additionally the DNS entry for the disabled server out as well then this would not work for us and we would have to implement NLB. But before I do that I wanted to double-check if my theory is correct or if I have setup something wrong.
Please let me know.
Answers
Your understanding is correct. If you use DNS RR for balancing the initial connections, then you will need to remove the DNS record if you take a server out of service for some reason. You may solve this issue by setting up dedicated redirector(s), using NLB, or using a rdp-aware hardware load balancer. For example, if you had a dedicated redirector you could take a RDSH server down for maintenance and things would still work as long as the redirector server and the other RDSH server were still working. The DNS entry for the farm would point to the redirector ip address instead of the RDSH servers.
Yes, use Drainstop on the host you plan to take out of service. This will make sure that no new initial connections will be sent to the RDSH via NLB.
All replies
MSP Provider (Network,Hardware,Software,WAN/LAN,Exchange,WiFi,Cisco Controllers/Routers/Switches/AP Autonomous/LWAPP)
One of the scenarios would be that we want to take out a RD Session host for maintenance for example. Or because we have a problem with one of the apps on the server. Besides that we are looking for redundancy. So if we lose one of the servers we do not cause an outage for our users. The question actually is will a NLB solve that problem?
I read your statement ‘remove the downed server from your connection brokers RDS config’. I am not sure where I am supposed to do that. On the Connection Broker I do not see the function and on the RD Session Host if I uncheck the ‘Participate in Connection Broker load-Balancing’ checkbox on ‘RD Connection Broker’ tab does not prevent any new logins.
Your understanding is correct. If you use DNS RR for balancing the initial connections, then you will need to remove the DNS record if you take a server out of service for some reason. You may solve this issue by setting up dedicated redirector(s), using NLB, or using a rdp-aware hardware load balancer. For example, if you had a dedicated redirector you could take a RDSH server down for maintenance and things would still work as long as the redirector server and the other RDSH server were still working. The DNS entry for the farm would point to the redirector ip address instead of the RDSH servers.
Thanks for your response. That is exactly the information I was looking for.
Here is just a small follow-up one. If I setup the NLB for my farm, and then take one of the RD Session Hosts out of my farm by clicking on ‘Allow connections, but prevent new logons’ do I also have to put the server into Drain mode in the NLB Manager or will that work automatically since the RD Session Host does not forward any requests to the connection broker anymore.
If you know the answer to this please let me know.
Yes, use Drainstop on the host you plan to take out of service. This will make sure that no new initial connections will be sent to the RDSH via NLB.
Thanks for the tips, i was in trouble when i need to put a server out of order, i had to put it off from the Session broker Group on SB.
Whatever, i’ve another issue that produce the same error message. All my RDS server are virtualized on Hyper V, but sometimes, the dedicated redirector don’t forward the logon request to the SB and another RDS server for logon. It stays on redirector and display ‘remote login are currently disabled’.
As usual, i reboot the redirector but it does not solve the problem all the time. So i reboot the SB too, but i’m wondering how it’s possible. The servers aren’t busy (CPU & RAM are highly available) and the Hyper V host isn’t busy either. I’ve got 4 differents RDS farms, all with 2 dedicated redirector, 1 Session Broker and about 10 to 80 servers behind.
Remote logins are currently disabled что значит
This forum has migrated to Microsoft Q&A. Visit Microsoft Q&A to post new questions.
Answered by:
Question
I have a RDS farm with two RD Session Hosts. I use DNS Round Robin and life is good and everything working until I try to take out one of the servers from the farm. To do so I go to the RD Session Host Configuration | Member of farm in RD Connection Broker | General tab | and check ‘Allow connections, but prevent new logons’.
When users now try to connect to the farm and DNS resolves the farm entry rdsfarm1.domain.com with the IP pointing to the RD Session Host I disabled they see the message ‘Remote Logins are currently disabled’. If they hit the server which is not disabled then everything works fine.
I now found the following thread in this forum and in there is sounds like this is expected. I personally would have expected that disabled RDS Session Host is still forwarding requests to Connection Broker but that does not seem to be the case.
If this is expected and I would have to take additionally the DNS entry for the disabled server out as well then this would not work for us and we would have to implement NLB. But before I do that I wanted to double-check if my theory is correct or if I have setup something wrong.
Please let me know.
Answers
Your understanding is correct. If you use DNS RR for balancing the initial connections, then you will need to remove the DNS record if you take a server out of service for some reason. You may solve this issue by setting up dedicated redirector(s), using NLB, or using a rdp-aware hardware load balancer. For example, if you had a dedicated redirector you could take a RDSH server down for maintenance and things would still work as long as the redirector server and the other RDSH server were still working. The DNS entry for the farm would point to the redirector ip address instead of the RDSH servers.
Yes, use Drainstop on the host you plan to take out of service. This will make sure that no new initial connections will be sent to the RDSH via NLB.
All replies
MSP Provider (Network,Hardware,Software,WAN/LAN,Exchange,WiFi,Cisco Controllers/Routers/Switches/AP Autonomous/LWAPP)
One of the scenarios would be that we want to take out a RD Session host for maintenance for example. Or because we have a problem with one of the apps on the server. Besides that we are looking for redundancy. So if we lose one of the servers we do not cause an outage for our users. The question actually is will a NLB solve that problem?
I read your statement ‘remove the downed server from your connection brokers RDS config’. I am not sure where I am supposed to do that. On the Connection Broker I do not see the function and on the RD Session Host if I uncheck the ‘Participate in Connection Broker load-Balancing’ checkbox on ‘RD Connection Broker’ tab does not prevent any new logins.
Your understanding is correct. If you use DNS RR for balancing the initial connections, then you will need to remove the DNS record if you take a server out of service for some reason. You may solve this issue by setting up dedicated redirector(s), using NLB, or using a rdp-aware hardware load balancer. For example, if you had a dedicated redirector you could take a RDSH server down for maintenance and things would still work as long as the redirector server and the other RDSH server were still working. The DNS entry for the farm would point to the redirector ip address instead of the RDSH servers.
Thanks for your response. That is exactly the information I was looking for.
Here is just a small follow-up one. If I setup the NLB for my farm, and then take one of the RD Session Hosts out of my farm by clicking on ‘Allow connections, but prevent new logons’ do I also have to put the server into Drain mode in the NLB Manager or will that work automatically since the RD Session Host does not forward any requests to the connection broker anymore.
If you know the answer to this please let me know.
Yes, use Drainstop on the host you plan to take out of service. This will make sure that no new initial connections will be sent to the RDSH via NLB.
Thanks for the tips, i was in trouble when i need to put a server out of order, i had to put it off from the Session broker Group on SB.
Whatever, i’ve another issue that produce the same error message. All my RDS server are virtualized on Hyper V, but sometimes, the dedicated redirector don’t forward the logon request to the SB and another RDS server for logon. It stays on redirector and display ‘remote login are currently disabled’.
As usual, i reboot the redirector but it does not solve the problem all the time. So i reboot the SB too, but i’m wondering how it’s possible. The servers aren’t busy (CPU & RAM are highly available) and the Hyper V host isn’t busy either. I’ve got 4 differents RDS farms, all with 2 dedicated redirector, 1 Session Broker and about 10 to 80 servers behind.
Remote logins are currently disabled что значит
This forum has migrated to Microsoft Q&A. Visit Microsoft Q&A to post new questions.
Answered by:
Question
I have a RDS farm with two RD Session Hosts. I use DNS Round Robin and life is good and everything working until I try to take out one of the servers from the farm. To do so I go to the RD Session Host Configuration | Member of farm in RD Connection Broker | General tab | and check ‘Allow connections, but prevent new logons’.
When users now try to connect to the farm and DNS resolves the farm entry rdsfarm1.domain.com with the IP pointing to the RD Session Host I disabled they see the message ‘Remote Logins are currently disabled’. If they hit the server which is not disabled then everything works fine.
I now found the following thread in this forum and in there is sounds like this is expected. I personally would have expected that disabled RDS Session Host is still forwarding requests to Connection Broker but that does not seem to be the case.
If this is expected and I would have to take additionally the DNS entry for the disabled server out as well then this would not work for us and we would have to implement NLB. But before I do that I wanted to double-check if my theory is correct or if I have setup something wrong.
Please let me know.
Answers
Your understanding is correct. If you use DNS RR for balancing the initial connections, then you will need to remove the DNS record if you take a server out of service for some reason. You may solve this issue by setting up dedicated redirector(s), using NLB, or using a rdp-aware hardware load balancer. For example, if you had a dedicated redirector you could take a RDSH server down for maintenance and things would still work as long as the redirector server and the other RDSH server were still working. The DNS entry for the farm would point to the redirector ip address instead of the RDSH servers.
Yes, use Drainstop on the host you plan to take out of service. This will make sure that no new initial connections will be sent to the RDSH via NLB.
All replies
MSP Provider (Network,Hardware,Software,WAN/LAN,Exchange,WiFi,Cisco Controllers/Routers/Switches/AP Autonomous/LWAPP)
One of the scenarios would be that we want to take out a RD Session host for maintenance for example. Or because we have a problem with one of the apps on the server. Besides that we are looking for redundancy. So if we lose one of the servers we do not cause an outage for our users. The question actually is will a NLB solve that problem?
I read your statement ‘remove the downed server from your connection brokers RDS config’. I am not sure where I am supposed to do that. On the Connection Broker I do not see the function and on the RD Session Host if I uncheck the ‘Participate in Connection Broker load-Balancing’ checkbox on ‘RD Connection Broker’ tab does not prevent any new logins.
Your understanding is correct. If you use DNS RR for balancing the initial connections, then you will need to remove the DNS record if you take a server out of service for some reason. You may solve this issue by setting up dedicated redirector(s), using NLB, or using a rdp-aware hardware load balancer. For example, if you had a dedicated redirector you could take a RDSH server down for maintenance and things would still work as long as the redirector server and the other RDSH server were still working. The DNS entry for the farm would point to the redirector ip address instead of the RDSH servers.
Thanks for your response. That is exactly the information I was looking for.
Here is just a small follow-up one. If I setup the NLB for my farm, and then take one of the RD Session Hosts out of my farm by clicking on ‘Allow connections, but prevent new logons’ do I also have to put the server into Drain mode in the NLB Manager or will that work automatically since the RD Session Host does not forward any requests to the connection broker anymore.
If you know the answer to this please let me know.
Yes, use Drainstop on the host you plan to take out of service. This will make sure that no new initial connections will be sent to the RDSH via NLB.
Thanks for the tips, i was in trouble when i need to put a server out of order, i had to put it off from the Session broker Group on SB.
Whatever, i’ve another issue that produce the same error message. All my RDS server are virtualized on Hyper V, but sometimes, the dedicated redirector don’t forward the logon request to the SB and another RDS server for logon. It stays on redirector and display ‘remote login are currently disabled’.
As usual, i reboot the redirector but it does not solve the problem all the time. So i reboot the SB too, but i’m wondering how it’s possible. The servers aren’t busy (CPU & RAM are highly available) and the Hyper V host isn’t busy either. I’ve got 4 differents RDS farms, all with 2 dedicated redirector, 1 Session Broker and about 10 to 80 servers behind.
Solutions to Fix Remote Logins are Currently Disabled Error Problem Issue
Remote logins are currently disabled error is a very commons error that user faces. The issue has been common when using the active directory, remote login on a domain controller, etc. Every time the user tries to log in to the server, the error appears and stops the login process. Furthermore, the error also appears while transferring the files from server to domain if you do not know how to troubleshoot this issue then it can be a headache in this article on troubleshooting this error. We will cover methods that will help eliminate this issue.
Causes of Remote Logins are Currently Disabled Error Problem:
Remote Logins Are Currently Disabled Citrix Error can occur due to multiple reasons. If any user that has the administrator privileges may disable the logins using the changelogon command easily. In was if the RDP port is closed for connection in the security setup, then this error appears. Another issue in which this error appears is while using the Citrix application, as the app has some privacy policy that parents the user for remote logging in. Furthermore, the error also if the Host server is put into the drain mode.
Similar Types of Remote Logins are Currently Disabled Error Issue:
How to Fix Remote Logins are Currently Disabled Error Issue
Troubleshooting Remote Logins Are Currently Disabled Citrix Error can be a little complicated. We have demonstrated methods that you can use to fix this error. The following are the methods. In the first method, we will manually enable the service or process using the command prompt. In the second method, we will enable the logon services using the Remote Desktop Session Host Configuration Utility. In the third method, we will fix the issue using the registry editor. Finally, in the fourth method, we will talk about some essential points that you should know.
1. Using Command Prompt –
In this method, we will fix the Remote Logins are Currently Disabled Citrix issue by using the command prompt. We will execute the command that will enable the disabled remote login services. Follow the steps.
2. Using the Remote Desktop Session Host Configuration Utility –
In this Remote Logins are Currently Disabled Server 2008 method, we will the Remote Desktop Session Host Configuration Utility enable the logon services.
3. Using Registry –
In this method, we will use the registry editor to resolve the Remote Logins are Currently Disabled Citrix issues. Kindly follow each step carefully as wrong changes may cause system instability. Follow the steps now.
4. Basic Troubleshooting –
Here we have mentioned some common verification points for getting rid out of this Remote Logins are Currently Disabled Server 2008 Citrix issue.
Conclusion:
We have seen four ways that will help you in eliminating Remote Logins Are Currently Disabled Citrix Error. The error only occurs if the netlogon or similar setting has been disabled. With this article you get all the methods by using step by step guide also we have briefly discussed its causes.
We hope these Remote Logins are Currently Disabled Citrix article resolves your issues. For more articles on troubleshooting, follow us. Thank you!